Page 186 · Module 08, Decide with Confidence · this screen continues that page

All 108 frameworks
8.1BeginnerModule 08 · Decide with Confidence

The DECIDE Framework

A structured six-step process for any decision that matters

The prompt

Copy & paste ready
8.1The DECIDE Framework
Act as a structured decision-making facilitator using the DECIDE framework. Decision to make : [DESCRIBE THE DECISION IN ONE SENTENCE] Deadline : [WHEN THIS MUST BE DECIDED] Context : [RELEVANT BACKGROUND, CONSTRAINTS, STAKEHOLDERS] Guide me through all six DECIDE steps: DEFINE : Restate the decision clearly and precisely. What is the core question being answered? ESTABLISH : What are the 4–5 criteria for a good decision? Weight each by importance (1–5). CONSIDER : Generate 3–4 realistic alternative options. Include one option I may be avoiding. IDENTIFY : Score each option against each criterion. Which scores highest overall? DEVELOP : What are the first 3 implementation steps? EVALUATE : What metric or signal will tell me at 90 days whether this was the right decision? The DECIDE Framework Define Consider Alternatives Develop & Implement Establish Criteria Identify Best Option Evaluate
LabelsReplace theseSwap the role below

LabelsReplace theseSwap the role below

Pro tip, from the book

The step most people skip is Establish defining criteria before looking at options. When you evaluate options without stated criteria, you unconsciously build the criteria around your preferred option. Writing criteria first makes the evaluation honest. If your preferred option scores poorly against honest criteria, that is the most valuable output from this framework.

Who should run this prompt

Module role profile

Who should stress-test your most important decisions? Most bad decisions were not obviously bad at the time — they had a good first-order case and a hidden second-order cost. The roles on this page are designed to surface what you cannot see from inside your own reasoning. Some will challenge your logic. Some will challenge your assumptions. One will challenge whether you are even asking the right question.

Choose any role to drop it into the prompt above. Only the highlighted opening clause changes — the rest of the prompt stays exactly as printed.

Internal rolesThink from inside the organisation
Outside perspectivesChallenge your blind spots

◆◆◆◆◆ → ◆ seniority, board level down to specialist outside the organisation

How to make any role sharper

  1. Add years of experience: "...with 15 years in enterprise SaaS" produces different depth than just the title.
  2. Add what they care most about: "You care most about [X]" shapes every word of the output.
  3. Add their communication style: "Be direct. Flag risks first. No jargon." changes the tone entirely.
See also: 1.3 Role Prompting - The Expert Chair

Use this when

The problem it solves

You are going in circles on an important decision. You have information but can't reach clarity. The same arguments keep coming up. You need a process to move from deliberation to decision.

How the framework works

From the printed page

The DECIDE framework, developed in decision science, is a six-step structured decision process: Define the problem (what exactly are you deciding?), Establish criteria (what does a good decision look like?), Consider alternatives (what are all the realistic options?), Identify the best option (evaluate alternatives against criteria), Develop and implement (commit and plan), Evaluate the outcome (review after the fact). Its value is in making implicit decision-making explicit surfacing the criteria and alternatives that are often left unstated, which is where most poor decisions hide.

The method, in four moves

Do these in order
1

Define the decision in one sentence before doing anything else ambiguous definition is the root of most decision paralysis.

2

Write your criteria before generating options criteria set after options are considered are reverse-engineered rationalisations.

3

Generate at least three alternatives binary choices limit thinking.

4

Set a decision date before starting the process. Open-ended decision timelines produce no decisions. If you're writing criteria after you've already generated the options, you're not deciding you're justifying a choice you already made. The order matters as much as the steps: criteria first, or the whole process becomes theater around a decision you'd already reached.

Where the framework comes from

Decision science methodology — DECIDE framework, Kristina Guo and others

When this page changes, your copy of the book does not have to.

The book prints the framework. This page keeps it — and keeps the prompt current, because prompting technique moves faster than print does. When it moves, this page is rewritten and the code in your copy keeps pointing at it. No second edition, no replacement purchase, no account.

If something here looks wrong — a prompt that does not match its framework, a figure that reads oddly — tell Raphy. That correction reaches every printed copy at once.

Framework8.1 of 108
Printed onPages 185186
Prompt extracted18 Sept 2026
Costs to readNothing, no account

Copying is free. An account keeps them.

Nothing on this page is behind a login and nothing ever will be. Save any prompt to your own list, pick up on another device, and send a colleague a link with your name on it. No card, no trial, no paywall on the prompts themselves.

See how it works
Save this framework to your own list
Pick up where you left off on another device
Send a colleague a link with your name on it