Page 196 · Module 08, Decide with Confidence · this screen continues that page

All 108 frameworks
8.6AdvancedModule 08 · Decide with Confidence

Red Team Thinking

Your team has reached consensus on a strategy or plan. Everyone is aligned and optimistic.

The prompt

Copy & paste ready
8.6Red Team Thinking
Act as a Red Team adversary. Your job is to find every weakness in the following plan and try to destroy it. Be thorough, critical, and honest. Do not be polite. The plan : [DESCRIBE YOUR STRATEGY, PRODUCT, OR DECISION] Our key assumptions : [LIST THE THINGS THAT MUST BE TRUE FOR THIS PLAN TO WORK] Attack this plan from four angles: STRATEGIC ATTACK : Why is the direction fundamentally wrong? What are we misreading about the market? EXECUTION ATTACK : Why will we fail to implement this? Where is our team not capable enough? COMPETITIVE ATTACK : How will competitors neutralise this? What move could make this irrelevant? ASSUMPTION ATTACK : Which single assumption, if wrong, kills the entire plan? End with: the one attack I should be most afraid of. Red Team Thinking Process Identify Weaknesses Simulate Attacks Gather Feedback Prioritize Fixes
LabelsReplace these

LabelsReplace these

Pro tip, from the book

Ask AI to play devil's advocate on your most confident belief about your business. Not your uncertainties, your certainties. The assumptions you are most sure about are the ones least likely to be tested. That is exactly what makes them dangerous. Red Team your strongest convictions quarterly.

Who should run this prompt

Module role profile

Who should stress-test your most important decisions? Most bad decisions were not obviously bad at the time — they had a good first-order case and a hidden second-order cost. The roles on this page are designed to surface what you cannot see from inside your own reasoning. Some will challenge your logic. Some will challenge your assumptions. One will challenge whether you are even asking the right question.

The roles below are who the book suggests running this prompt — this lesson’s prompt doesn’t open with a single swappable role clause, so pick one and adapt the prompt’s own wording yourself.

Internal rolesThink from inside the organisation
Board DirectorGovernance, risk, fiduciary responsibility, long-termBefore any irreversible or high-stakes decision
Chief Risk OfficerWhat could go seriously wrong — and how bad is it?Mapping the tail risks before committing
Strategy DirectorIs this decision consistent with where we said we are going?When a decision feels right but contradicts the strategy
Operations ManagerCan we actually execute this — with the people and budget we have?Before committing to any plan that requires operational delivery
Behavioural EconomistWhich cognitive biases are distorting this right now?When you notice the team is unusually aligned — suspiciously fast
Data AnalystWhat does the evidence actually say versus what we believe?When a decision is being made on instinct that should be made on data
Outside perspectivesChallenge your blind spots
Red Team LeadFind every weakness in the plan before an adversary doesBefore launching, announcing, or committing publicly
Crisis ManagerWhat happens when this goes wrong? Are you ready?For any decision that would be hard to reverse
Devil's AdvocateArgues the opposite position as hard as possibleWhen the room agrees too quickly
Future Self (10 years ahead)Looking back — what would you wish you had decided?For life-scale decisions where short- term and long-term diverge

◆◆◆◆◆ → ◆ seniority, board level down to specialist outside the organisation

How to make any role sharper

  1. Add years of experience: "...with 15 years in enterprise SaaS" produces different depth than just the title.
  2. Add what they care most about: "You care most about [X]" shapes every word of the output.
  3. Add their communication style: "Be direct. Flag risks first. No jargon." changes the tone entirely.
See also: 1.3 Role Prompting - The Expert Chair

Use this when

The problem it solves

But consensus is not the same as correctness and optimism is not the same as rigor. You need someone to try to break the plan before you execute it.

How the framework works

From the printed page

Red Teaming originates from US military and CIA practice, a dedicated team whose sole job is to find weaknesses in friendly plans by thinking like the adversary. In business, Red Team Thinking means assembling a small group (or prompting AI) to argue as hard as possible against your plan, assumption, or strategy. Unlike a Pre-Mortem (which imagines failure after the fact), Red Team Thinking operates in real time, it is an adversarial stress test of your current thinking. The goal is not to be negative but to find the genuine weaknesses before they are exploited by reality. The moment you defend your plan instead of listening, the Red Team session is over, everyone in the room reads it, and the honest attacks stop coming. Rule 2 exists for a reason: a Red Team that gets argued with becomes a Red Team that goes quiet. Defensiveness Kills the Exercise

The method, in four moves

Do these in order
1

Brief the Red Team with the full plan, they cannot attack what they don't understand.

2

Prohibit defensive responses during the Red Team session, the goal is to hear, not rebut.

3

Ask for the single most dangerous attack on your plan, not a laundry list.

4

After the session, sort attacks by likelihood and severity, then address the top three. Attack your own plan before someone else does

Where the framework comes from

US Military / CIA — Red Team methodology · Micah Zenko, Red Team, 2015

When this page changes, your copy of the book does not have to.

The book prints the framework. This page keeps it — and keeps the prompt current, because prompting technique moves faster than print does. When it moves, this page is rewritten and the code in your copy keeps pointing at it. No second edition, no replacement purchase, no account.

If something here looks wrong — a prompt that does not match its framework, a figure that reads oddly — tell Raphy. That correction reaches every printed copy at once.

Framework8.6 of 108
Printed onPages 195196
Prompt extracted18 Sept 2026
Costs to readNothing, no account

Copying is free. An account keeps them.

Nothing on this page is behind a login and nothing ever will be. Save any prompt to your own list, pick up on another device, and send a colleague a link with your name on it. No card, no trial, no paywall on the prompts themselves.

See how it works
Save this framework to your own list
Pick up where you left off on another device
Send a colleague a link with your name on it