Page 223 · Module 09, Finance & Metrics · this screen continues that page

All 108 frameworks
9.9IntermediateModule 09 · Finance & Metrics

Rule of 40

The single benchmark that tells investors whether your SaaS business is healthy

The prompt

Copy & paste ready
9.9Rule of 40
Act as a SaaS financial advisor using the Rule of 40. My business metrics: Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR): [CURRENT ARR] ARR 12 months ago: [PRIOR YEAR ARR] EBITDA or Operating Profit Margin: [X% - negative if burning] Calculate my Rule of 40 score: Revenue Growth Rate = (Current ARR - Prior ARR) / Prior ARR Rule of 40 Score = Growth Rate % + Profit Margin % Analyse: 1. What is my current Rule of 40 score? 2. How does it compare to the 40 benchmark? 3. Am I growth-led or efficiency-led - which matters more at my current stage? 4. To reach a score of 40, should I prioritise accelerating growth or improving margin? 5. What is the single most impactful action to improve my score by 5 points in 6 months?
LabelsReplace theseSwap the role below

LabelsReplace theseSwap the role below

Pro tip, from the book

The Rule of 40 is most useful as a framing tool in investor conversations, not as an internal operating metric. When an investor asks about your growth vs profitability tradeoff, presenting a Rule of 40 score and explaining your strategy for where it should go signals financial maturity. Most founders don't know this number. Knowing it immediately sets you apart.

Who should run this prompt

Module role profile

Who should review your numbers and financial narrative? Numbers do not lie — but they can mislead when read through the wrong lens. A CFO and an investor look at the same P&L and ask completely different questions. A customer's finance team looks at your pricing and asks a question neither of them thought of. Use this page to choose who is in the room before you present, model, or decide based on your financial data.

Choose any role to drop it into the prompt above. Only the highlighted opening clause changes — the rest of the prompt stays exactly as printed.

Internal rolesThink from inside the organisation
Outside perspectivesChallenge your blind spots

◆◆◆◆◆ → ◆ seniority, board level down to specialist outside the organisation

How to make any role sharper

  1. Add years of experience: "...with 15 years in enterprise SaaS" produces different depth than just the title.
  2. Add what they care most about: "You care most about [X]" shapes every word of the output.
  3. Add their communication style: "Be direct. Flag risks first. No jargon." changes the tone entirely.
See also: 1.3 Role Prompting - The Expert Chair

Use this when

The problem it solves

You are a SaaS or subscription business trying to balance growth and profitability. Investors ask whether you are growing fast enough or profitable enough and you are not sure how to frame the answer in a way that makes the tradeoff clear.

How the framework works

From the printed page

The Rule of 40 was popularised by venture investors Brad Feld and Fred Wilson as a benchmark for SaaS business health. It states that a healthy SaaS company's revenue growth rate plus its profit margin should equal or exceed 40. A company growing at 60% with a -20% margin scores 40. A company growing at 15% with a 25% margin also scores 40. Both are considered healthy. The rule allows a company to trade growth for profitability or vice versa, as long as the combined score stays above 40. Below 40 signals either insufficient growth or insufficient efficiency.

The method, in four moves

Do these in order
1

Calculate your Rule of 40 score monthly and track the trend the direction matters as much as the level.

2

Early-stage companies should skew toward growth (high growth rate, negative margin) the rule becomes more relevant at $5M+ ARR.

3

Use the Rule of 40 to frame the growth vs profitability tradeoff in investor conversations explicitly.

4

If your score is below 40, use the model to identify whether the fix is growth acceleration or cost reduction. Below $5M ARR, the Rule of 40 isn't yet the right lens, investors expect growth to dominate, even at a steep loss. Applying it too early can make a normal, healthy growth-stage burn look like a problem it isn't.

Where the framework comes from

Brad Feld & Fred Wilson — Rule of 40 for SaaS, 2015

When this page changes, your copy of the book does not have to.

The book prints the framework. This page keeps it — and keeps the prompt current, because prompting technique moves faster than print does. When it moves, this page is rewritten and the code in your copy keeps pointing at it. No second edition, no replacement purchase, no account.

If something here looks wrong — a prompt that does not match its framework, a figure that reads oddly — tell Raphy. That correction reaches every printed copy at once.

Framework9.9 of 108
Printed onPages 222223
Prompt extracted18 Sept 2026
Costs to readNothing, no account

Copying is free. An account keeps them.

Nothing on this page is behind a login and nothing ever will be. Save any prompt to your own list, pick up on another device, and send a colleague a link with your name on it. No card, no trial, no paywall on the prompts themselves.

See how it works
Save this framework to your own list
Pick up where you left off on another device
Send a colleague a link with your name on it