Page 207 · Module 09, Finance & Metrics · this screen continues that page

All 108 frameworks
9.1IntermediateModule 09 · Finance & Metrics

Unit Economics - LTV:CAC

The two numbers that tell you whether your business model actually works

The prompt

Copy & paste ready
9.1Unit Economics - LTV:CAC
Act as a startup finance advisor specialising in unit economics. My business model : [DESCRIBE HOW YOU ACQUIRE AND RETAIN CUSTOMERS] Revenue model : [SUBSCRIPTION / TRANSACTION / USAGE-BASED] Help me calculate and analyse my LTV:CAC: LTV CALCULATION: Average Revenue Per Customer (monthly or annual): [X] Gross Margin %: [X] Average Customer Lifespan or Churn Rate: [X] LTV = (ARPC × Gross Margin) / Churn Rate CAC CALCULATION: Total Sales & Marketing Spend (last period): [X] New Customers Acquired (same period): [X] CAC = Total Spend / New Customers ANALYSIS: 1. What is my LTV:CAC ratio? 2. How does it compare to healthy benchmarks for my model? 3. What is the payback period (months to recover CAC)? 4. What one change would most improve this ratio?
LabelsReplace theseSwap the role below

LabelsReplace theseSwap the role below

Pro tip, from the book

Payback period is often more important than the LTV:CAC ratio for early-stage companies. A 5:1 LTV:CAC sounds excellent, until you realise the payback period is 36 months and you're burning cash for three years before each customer turns profitable. A 2. 5:1 ratio with a 9-month payback is often a healthier business than a 5:1 with a 30-month payback.

Who should run this prompt

Module role profile

Who should review your numbers and financial narrative? Numbers do not lie — but they can mislead when read through the wrong lens. A CFO and an investor look at the same P&L and ask completely different questions. A customer's finance team looks at your pricing and asks a question neither of them thought of. Use this page to choose who is in the room before you present, model, or decide based on your financial data.

Choose any role to drop it into the prompt above. Only the highlighted opening clause changes — the rest of the prompt stays exactly as printed.

Internal rolesThink from inside the organisation
Outside perspectivesChallenge your blind spots

◆◆◆◆◆ → ◆ seniority, board level down to specialist outside the organisation

How to make any role sharper

  1. Add years of experience: "...with 15 years in enterprise SaaS" produces different depth than just the title.
  2. Add what they care most about: "You care most about [X]" shapes every word of the output.
  3. Add their communication style: "Be direct. Flag risks first. No jargon." changes the tone entirely.
See also: 1.3 Role Prompting - The Expert Chair

Use this when

The problem it solves

You are acquiring customers and growing revenue but you're not sure whether each customer is genuinely profitable when you account for the full cost of acquiring and serving them. You might be scaling a model that loses money per customer.

How the framework works

From the printed page

LTV:CAC is the foundational unit economics ratio for any customer-acquisition business. LTV (Lifetime Value) is the total revenue a customer generates over their relationship with you, minus the cost to serve them. CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost) is the total cost - marketing, sales, onboarding - to acquire one customer. The ratio tells you how much value you get back per dollar spent acquiring a customer. A ratio of 3:1 or higher is generally considered healthy - meaning every dollar spent on acquisition returns three dollars of lifetime value. Below 1:1 means you are paying more to acquire customers than they are worth. The ratio alone does not tell you the full story without payback period. A business can show a healthy 4:1 ratio while taking three years to recoup each customer's acquisition cost, which is a cash flow problem the ratio hides.

The method, in four moves

Do these in order
1

Calculate LTV using actual retention data not assumed churn rates. Real churn is almost always higher than expected.

2

Calculate CAC by dividing total sales and marketing spend by new customers acquired in the same period.

3

Segment LTV and CAC by customer type averages hide the fact that some segments are highly profitable and others destroy value.

4

Track the LTV:CAC ratio monthly improvement signals a healthier model, decline signals a problem before it becomes a crisis.

Where the framework comes from

SaaS & venture capital methodology — LTV:CAC framework widely standardised 2010s

When this page changes, your copy of the book does not have to.

The book prints the framework. This page keeps it — and keeps the prompt current, because prompting technique moves faster than print does. When it moves, this page is rewritten and the code in your copy keeps pointing at it. No second edition, no replacement purchase, no account.

If something here looks wrong — a prompt that does not match its framework, a figure that reads oddly — tell Raphy. That correction reaches every printed copy at once.

Framework9.1 of 108
Printed onPages 206207
Prompt extracted18 Sept 2026
Costs to readNothing, no account

Copying is free. An account keeps them.

Nothing on this page is behind a login and nothing ever will be. Save any prompt to your own list, pick up on another device, and send a colleague a link with your name on it. No card, no trial, no paywall on the prompts themselves.

See how it works
Save this framework to your own list
Pick up where you left off on another device
Send a colleague a link with your name on it